Reviewer #2: Firstly I would like to apologise for my late response on this. Reviewing this edited paper had not got onto my radar.
Secondly all the points in my original report have now been addressed. I do feel that the literature review could have gone a little bit further beyond my stated suggestions, but it is now sufficient to give the paper more context.
Reviewer #2: Firstly I would like to apologise for my late response on this. Reviewing this edited paper had not got onto my radar.
Secondly all the points in my original report have now been addressed. I do feel that the literature review could have gone a little bit further beyond my stated suggestions, but it is now sufficient to give the paper more context.
issue #15 refers