search

RobokopU24 / Feedback

Feedback on the ROBOKOP project
https://robokop.renci.org
0 stars 0 forks source link

Funding statement #127

Closed karafecho closed 1 year ago

karafecho commented 1 year ago

This issue is to suggest an alignment of the funding statement on the main page of the ROBOKOP org (https://github.com/RobokopU24 - README) and on the question-builder page (https://qgraph.renci.org/question) with that on the ROBOKOP landing page (https://robokop.renci.org/).

karafecho commented 1 year ago

Note that the current funding statement on the ROBOKOP landing page contains two typos. (This may be fixed with next deployment).

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  2. ExEmplar is not funded, and so this sentence can be removed: "ExEmPLAR is funded by XXX".

_ROBOKOP is a joint creation of the Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and CoVar LLC. The prototype was developed with funding from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, National Institutes of Health (award #OT2TR002514). ROBOKOP's continued development is supported with joint funding from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Office of Data Science Strategy within the Institutes of Health (award #U24ES035214). ExEmPLAR is funded by XXX_

I was asked to review a PR about the funding statement a few weeks ago and thought the issue had been resolved, but apparently, it has not.

Woozl commented 1 year ago

@karafecho thanks for reminding me of this yesterday, I remembered reading this last week, but for some reason, Github didn't put it in my inbox!

Good catch with the typos, I have made the requested changes, which should be visible on the landing page. Would you mind verifying the changes, and then notifying Chris so that he can copy it from the website into the Github organization README?

Regarding the question-builder in your first comment, I'm a bit confused, I thought we had already landed on an update, see here: https://github.com/RobokopU24/qgraph/pull/249

karafecho commented 1 year ago

Thanks, David. I noticed two things:

  1. The link to the National Institutes of Health probably should be added to the first mention of NIH. (But this is a very picky comment.)
  2. The second mention of NIH is written as "Institutes of Health" instead of "National Institutes of Health".

I think the fix to the question-builder page was not in place when I posted this ticket.

karafecho commented 1 year ago

Note that Chris and Alex may prefer to include the same funding statement across pages. We shall see.

Woozl commented 1 year ago
  1. The link to the National Institutes of Health probably should be added to the first mention of NIH. (But this is a very picky comment.)
  2. The second mention of NIH is written as "Institutes of Health" instead of "National Institutes of Health".

updated!