Closed karafecho closed 4 months ago
This is a bit confusing - RENCI SRI Reference KG is our parsing of the SRI Reference KG, which we have called "Biolink", which led to some confusion and @karafecho wrote up a description for the biolink model, which we do not have a plater or KG for. I wrote that title and description as a placeholder, but it could be improved obviously. This is a source we include in the ROBOKOP KG though.
I agree that this is confusing. The Automat landing page now lists both SRI Reference KG and RENCI SRI Reference KG. I assume you would not include both in the ROBOKOP KG? If that's the case, then perhaps you can remove one or the other?
I will update the description when I proofread and finalize the Automat descriptions.
What does our parsing do?
Are we satisfied with the current setup or is there more work to do here?
Sort of. We still have two different SRI Reference KGs exposed as Automats: RENCI SRI Reference KG and SRI Reference KG. I don't think we need to expose the RENCI SRI Reference KG, although I suppose it isn't confusing or damaging to do so, unlike the Ubergraph and Ubergraph Redundant issue. I'll defer to @EvanDietzMorris .
This is not resolved - we are no longer hosting the RENCI version of monarch KG as a standalone Plater, we changed the name of the actual graph to monarch KG, it looks like the UI was not updated to reflect either change.
This issue is to suggest that we remove RENCI SRI Reference KG from the Automat landing page.