Reference List

[meneal]

Here's the list, strike through anything you've read already:

• Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems
• Prairie Rose: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places
• Adam: Cross-cultural studies of the computers are social actors paradigm: The case of reciprocity
• Prairie Rose Race in the live and the virtual interview: Racial deference, social desirability, and activation effects in attitude surveys
• Adam: Sympathetic guitar: humans respond socially to interactive technology in an abstract, expressive context
• Adam: Can a retail web site be social?
• Adam: Effects of mental model quality on collaborative system performance
• Shaown: Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
• Matt Neal: How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence
• Shaown: Establishing and Maintaining Long-term Human-computer Relationships
• Matt Neal: Responses to robot social roles and social role framing
• Matt Neal: Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent?
• Prairie Rose: On the difficulty of replicating human subjects studies in software engineering
• Prairie Rose Are computers scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human computer interaction

Just try to edit this and strikethrough whatever we've already read. Strikethrough in github flavored markdown is "~~" on either side of whatever you want to strike out.

My hope is that we can get this finished up today and split the papers from there.

[acmarrs]

PR and I have marked the papers we'll be responsible for writing related work paragraphs for. There are 14 papers above, but I thought we had around 17. Are we missing some?

[meneal]

I only find 14 in the sharelatex bibliography... Are there more somewhere else that I'm just not finding?

[meneal]

One other thing, do we actually need to write a summary for the Lung paper? We all theoretically already read the whole thing and sat through an hour long discussion of it...

[acmarrs]

I think our "summary" should simply be the 3-4 sentences we want about that paper written directly into the ShareLatex. This should make Shaown's life a lot easier as he edits and glues them all together into a sensible whole.

[meneal]

Maybe we should put those summaries into some separate file. Seems like it might be easier that way. I've added something called blob.tex. Use or do not use, whichever is clever.

[botwithfeelings]

I have marked down the two that were left.

[meneal]

I never got around to adding that blob.tex file. Based on a chat with Shaown this afternoon he preferred just an md in the repo. So I added one to the root of the 710 repo here. I'm putting some stuff under my links.

[prgoodwin]

I didn't see a blob.tex in sharelatex, so I went ahead and made a new one under the final template folder. (sorry if this is causing a duplicate somewhere).

I dropped in 3 of my 4 summaries. Next one to come by tomorrow.

[meneal]

There are a bunch here in this markdown. I've moved the ones you've already added there. Sorry for the confusion about the blob.tex thing. Shaown told me that he preferred us to put them in md.