Could you please update the older scheme to follow ROS Best Practices? Right now the package is in a folder (which can be our meta-package, and that's cool) that is named ROS-Driver-Update which is under ROS-Driver. Neither of those follow ROS naming or project conventions, but rather look like someone copied over from a network drive they are using to version control. This encourages modifying the repo and breaking pulls for little return
Could you please update the older scheme to follow ROS Best Practices? Right now the package is in a folder (which can be our meta-package, and that's cool) that is named ROS-Driver-Update which is under ROS-Driver. Neither of those follow ROS naming or project conventions, but rather look like someone copied over from a network drive they are using to version control. This encourages modifying the repo and breaking pulls for little return
For reference: ROS Best Practices ROS Patterns/Conventions
Best regards,