Closed MateusStano closed 2 months ago
This PR will probably conflict with #632 in the test files
Attention: Patch coverage is 92.75362%
with 5 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 74.66%. Comparing base (
0b779f2
) to head (6265f05
). Report is 814 commits behind head on enh/sensors-impl.
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
rocketpy/simulation/flight.py | 79.16% | 5 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Pull request type
Checklist
black rocketpy/ tests/
) has passed locallypytest tests -m slow --runslow
) have passed locallyCHANGELOG.md
has been updated (if relevant)Changes
GNSS
The noise parameters of the
GNSS
are much simpler than from the other sensors. I made it so because it seems that errors are taken into account asaccuracy
rather then noise densities in GNSS sensors.I am not sure if the way its done is the most robust way of doing this, but it was what I gathered from research
Breaking change