Closed LUCKIN13 closed 4 days ago
Thanks @Gui-FernandesBR for your review. Valid points, almost totally fixed. In terms of the drag data, that's the only data we have. I'll try contacting the team, to see if we can improve that example!
Thanks @Gui-FernandesBR for your review. Valid points, almost totally fixed. In terms of the drag data, that's the only data we have. I'll try contacting the team, to see if we can improve that example!
Understood.
I noticed the power_on drag is higher than the power_off drag. It should be the opposite tho. If you swap those files, does the results get better or worse? If worse, just forget about what I said.
@Gui-FernandesBR just went with the higher value in drag. 30 meters reduction, and I believe that since is a constant drag, it's difficult to reach better results. This can be updated later, if the team gives us more data.
@Gui-FernandesBR just went with the higher value in drag. 30 meters reduction, and I believe that since is a constant drag, it's difficult to reach better results. This can be updated later, if the team gives us more data.
Great work. That's what I expected. 5% is already really nice.
Off-topic, I believe GitHub has solved a long-known-issue which is the notebook diffs.
Pull request type
Checklist
black rocketpy/ tests/
) has passed locallypytest tests -m slow --runslow
) have passed locallyCHANGELOG.md
has been updated (if relevant)Additional information
This branch still needs some data reviews since the simulation file was developed in an older version of RocketPy. However, reviews can already be made, since the example should only suffer minor changes, if needed. Changelog and Index for examples will be updated in other flight example, to prevent conflicts.