Closed RohanAlexander closed 1 year ago
By paragraph:
- 24 sounds very university centric. Intentional ?
Good point. Have modified.
- 26 borrows rather than takes?
Much better
- 30 I wonder if you might have a stronger setting up of "I'm going to talk about the following things in this conclusion"? The questions of the next few sections just sort of appear.
Good point. Now telegraph the punches.
- 56 This reads as drive-by politics. Are you referring to something that you discussed earlier in the book?
Have removed.
- Q4 seems to me to be a bit too breezy.
Have added something specific.
- 62 strike coma after "these draw on data science
Removed
- 64 "mistakenly dominant quantitative analysis" rewrite. Not sure mistakenly works. Maybe just "which dominate quant... even though
Removed.
- 64 modify power with statistical lest I read it as social power given the multidisciplinary character of this section?
Modified.
- 68 you advocate following the path of discipline action, joining the pantheon?
Adjusted.
- 'even as some of the constituent parts lack it.' these read kind of subtweetish. Not sure if you can't get away with not saying more.
Good point. Have removed.
- 72 is this list enough for it to claim disciplinary status?
Good point. Have added modifiers. I don't know what makes a discipline lol.
- 80 best practices ARE.
Fixed
By paragraph: