Open mrkazoodle opened 2 months ago
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.
Hi,
I'm glad the response was not an immediate no, but no response at all is not very positive either... 😐
Hi,
We are not against code signing. But it is not our priority :/
Hi, I understand it doesn't add any functionality, but probably this would help with anti viruses: we use avast (business), and it doesn't like it. This was also probably the reason that a fork existed for intune Probably it is better when using applocker, to only run signed code (we're not using that yet, but planning to).
Hi, AppLocker does not mind if a script file is signed using approved cert of approved by file hash. However setting your security levels too high may break PowerShell-based tool such as this one.
Please do not start from limiting the language mode. That will basically castrate your Helpdesk, IT-Ops and scripted solutions you may not know to have in your company. That will be the worst kind of ice-bucket challenge you can think of.
You've been warned. Good Luck
The request
Hi,
Please look into code signing again.
There is a Linux foundation project for code signing: https://www.sigstore.dev/
Here's the announcement on Google's security blog a couple of years ago: https://security.googleblog.com/2021/03/introducing-sigstore-easy-code-signing.html?m=1
There are some big companies backing this project, and they aim to be the let's encrypt for code signing, so it seems to me like a real opportunity to finally add this much requested feature.
Thanks in advance
Is your feature request related to a problem?
No response
Additional information
No response