Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Hello,
Thanks for this report.
Actually you are trying to remove autogen.sh in order to use autoreconf. Could
you
try to run "autoreconf -vis" instead of "autogen.sh" mainly on Mac OS X (Debian
is
already confirmed to work.)
Original comment by romu...@libnfc.org
on 20 Apr 2010 at 8:53
$ autoreconf -vis
autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext
autoreconf: running: aclocal -I m4
autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing
autoreconf: running: libtoolize
libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'.
libtoolize: linking file `./ltmain.sh'
libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, `m4'.
libtoolize: linking file `m4/libtool.m4'
libtoolize: linking file `m4/ltoptions.m4'
libtoolize: linking file `m4/ltsugar.m4'
libtoolize: linking file `m4/ltversion.m4'
libtoolize: linking file `m4/lt~obsolete.m4'
autoreconf: running: /opt/local/bin/autoconf
autoreconf: running: /opt/local/bin/autoheader
autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --no-force
configure.ac:22: installing `./config.guess'
configure.ac:22: installing `./config.sub'
configure.ac:13: installing `./install-sh'
configure.ac:13: installing `./missing'
examples/Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp'
Makefile.am: installing `./INSTALL'
autoreconf: Leaving directory `.'
OK, "autoreconf -vis" does work for me on Mac OS X Snow Leopard.
Note that I use my own versions of autoconf, automake and libtoolize. The
versions
included in Snow Leopard where too old for other projects I use.
Original comment by ludovic....@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2010 at 7:27
Great ! In r401, autogen.sh have been deleted, developers should now use
"autoreconf
-vis" but i have applied your patch in r400 in case of some users reports
problems
with autoreconf command.
Thank you Ludovic for your help. (And indirectly, thank you for ACR122 support
in
libnfc ;) )
PS: I made a mistake in my previous comment: s/Actually you are trying/Actually
we
are trying/
Original comment by romu...@libnfc.org
on 20 Apr 2010 at 8:31
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ludovic....@gmail.com
on 17 Apr 2010 at 9:50