This is a very interesting idea (that I hadn't considered before) - but I think the LIT (which is not yet open-sourced) could be used very easily to provide this handy module directly from the authoritative vocabs themselves (rather than being hand-crafted and maintained, which I assume is currently being done here). The LIT already supports the important notion of being able to 'cherry-pick' terms from vocabs (which is being done here already, for example in the selection of specific terms from ActivityStreams, but is kinda crucial when you start picking terms from Schema.org's almost 2,000 terms (last time I checked!)).
@nseydoux perhaps this could be added to our list of 'things-to-do' for the LIT...?
This is a very interesting idea (that I hadn't considered before) - but I think the LIT (which is not yet open-sourced) could be used very easily to provide this handy module directly from the authoritative vocabs themselves (rather than being hand-crafted and maintained, which I assume is currently being done here). The LIT already supports the important notion of being able to 'cherry-pick' terms from vocabs (which is being done here already, for example in the selection of specific terms from ActivityStreams, but is kinda crucial when you start picking terms from Schema.org's almost 2,000 terms (last time I checked!)).
@nseydoux perhaps this could be added to our list of 'things-to-do' for the LIT...?