Open marclaporte opened 4 years ago
I like this idea. We haven't done a full keyword inventory yet ever. What did you have in mind for the new doc page?
Here is something similar: https://doc.tiki.org/Keywords but I think we can do better.
End result: A few sections of alphabetical lists of all keywords / acronyms / concepts and with links to relevant documentation, code or feature requests. This will be very good for SEO. For people that are new to ML: it permits to discover concepts (with hyperlinks). For experienced people, it helps position Rubix vs what they know. Even keywords for which we have no code/intention: it should explain why we don't do and perhaps link to alternatives.
The ones we want to reuse on Open Hub / Packagist / Github are identified somehow. Ex.: in bold or a color.
Proposed plan:
Kinda like a glossary except instead of a brief summary of the topic we provide a link to the content?
yup :-)
We have something like that here ...
https://github.com/RubixML/RubixML/blob/master/mkdocs.yml
Do we need something more for discovery and SEO purposes?
That is a superb list! I love it. Let's build on it.
2 things to add:
Thanks!
Rubix ML has a huge number of features. Each feature can be a way for users to discover us. And once they do, discover all the richness.
Keywords on Github, and the following sources are inconsistent: https://www.openhub.net/p/RubixML https://packagist.org/packages/rubix/
I will make a more complete list of keywords, to be used everywhere. This will likely be a new page in the docs, so we can put relevant hyperlinks, and we can improve collaboratively from then on.
This issue is just a reminder for me to do so. If you have ideas on the topic, please share.