search

RuiAAPeres / Reactor

Powering your RAC architecture
MIT License
184 stars 11 forks source link

Seems to be not worth in real project. #19

Closed huanghe810229530 closed 8 years ago

huanghe810229530 commented 8 years ago

With the price of this structure is too big, need to abandon Alamofire etc. Many excellent library?

RuiAAPeres commented 8 years ago

I'm not sure what's being asked here, so I will take a stab at what you mean:

Reactor has a very particular use case, that will not suit everyone. It allows you to not repeat yourself in terms of your application flow, particularly how your model layer works:

screen shot 2016-05-27 at 14 28 07

Saying that Alamofire needs to be abandoned in order to use it, is a bit unfair, since you only need to make Alamofire comply with the Connection protocol.

As for other libraries, I think you are referring to parsing and persistence. The persistence, doesn't have a protocol yet, but it can easily be created ( I will work on that). As for the parser you can use the Mappable.

Hope this can make you change your mind about Reactor and how useful it can be. 🦄 In the meantime, I will update the documentation, so I can clarify this for other potential users.

huanghe810229530 commented 8 years ago

I think I understand is wrong, I'm looking forward to can be used to project. Thank you!

RuiAAPeres commented 8 years ago

@huanghe810229530 I just updated the README. The 3rd Party section, should be useful.

huanghe810229530 commented 8 years ago

@RuiAAPeres I am new to ReactiveCocoa, of course, this update to help to me.Thank you very much!