Open ew-kim opened 6 months ago
Thanks for asking. However, we didn't reimplemented the code of OmniAL. The comparison results are directly copied from their paper.
Best wishes, Ruiying Lu
At 2024-01-09 09:41:27, "eunwankim" @.***> wrote:
Thank you for your great work, I have a question.
In the paper, you said, "Our proposed model surpasses the best of the comparison methods, i.e., UniAD, by 1.3% on image-AUROC, leading to significantly superior performances than the modest recent unified model OmniAL".
However, it looks like the author of OmniAL didn't release their official code. About the results from Table 2, I wonder if you reimplemented their code to generate the results?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Thank you for your great work, I have a question.
In the paper, you said, "Our proposed model surpasses the best of the comparison methods, i.e., UniAD, by 1.3% on image-AUROC, leading to significantly superior performances than the modest recent unified model OmniAL".
However, it looks like the author of OmniAL didn't release their official code. About the results from Table 2, I wonder if you reimplemented their code to generate the results?