EqQ sometimes called with only one argument

[axkr]

Found these lines, where EqQ is called with only one argument. But where seem to be no definition for only one argument.

EqQ[m + 1/2] in this line

• https://github.com/RuleBasedIntegration/Rubi/blob/26b65aa1e3adf733511df3a4d7ffb2d8709a5a9d/Rubi/IntegrationRules/1%20Algebraic%20functions/1.2%20Trinomial%20products/1.2.4%20Improper/1.2.4.2%20(d%20x)%5Em%20(a%20x%5Eq%2Bb%20x%5En%2Bc%20x%5E(2%20n-q))%5Ep.m#L7

EqQ[m - 2*n + 1] in these lines:

• https://github.com/RuleBasedIntegration/Rubi/blob/26b65aa1e3adf733511df3a4d7ffb2d8709a5a9d/Rubi/IntegrationRules/6%20Hyperbolic%20functions/6.1%20Hyperbolic%20sine/6.1.12%20(e%20x)%5Em%20(a%2Bb%20sinh(c%2Bd%20x%5En))%5Ep.m#L38
• https://github.com/RuleBasedIntegration/Rubi/blob/26b65aa1e3adf733511df3a4d7ffb2d8709a5a9d/Rubi/IntegrationRules/6%20Hyperbolic%20functions/6.1%20Hyperbolic%20sine/6.1.12%20(e%20x)%5Em%20(a%2Bb%20sinh(c%2Bd%20x%5En))%5Ep.m#L39

[AlbertRich]

Thanks axkr for reporting these deficiencies in Rubi 4.16.1. They were introduced when converting Rubi from using ZeroQ[u] to EqQ[u,0]. Turns out they are harmless, and so were not discovered by the integration test-suite. If you wish to fix them anyway:

• In the file "1.2.4.2 (d x)^m (a x^q+b x^n+c x^(2 n-q))^p", simply delete EqQ[m+1/2] ||.
• In the file "6.1.12 (e x)^m (a+b sinh(c+d x^n))^p", change the two occurrences of EqQ[m-2*n+1] to EqQ[m-2*n+1,0].

Albert