Closed JedStephens closed 5 years ago
I already discussed this with Albert some time ago, but it seems we kind of forgot about it since there were more pressing matters at the time. However, I absolutely agree with you that we need to provide a consistent way to cite Rubi.
I suggest that we publish Rubi in the The Journal of Open Source Software. This will provide a DOI and we have the chance to explain in a small overview paper, why Rubi is important. In addition, it is a win-win for everyone: Users have a definite reference that they can cite and Rubi will be more visible. I will report back.
@JedStephens We have seen your article on arxiv. At the moment, we have prepared a manuscript for JOSS and it is currently under review there. When they accept the article for publication, you will have a DOI for referencing.
@JedStephens Finally, we have an official paper about Rubi
You can now cite Rubi with BibTeX in the following way
@article{Rich2018,
doi = {10.21105/joss.01073},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01073},
year = {2018},
month = {dec},
publisher = {The Open Journal},
volume = {3},
number = {32},
pages = {1073},
author = {Albert Rich and Patrick Scheibe and Nasser Abbasi},
title = {Rule-based integration: An extensive system of symbolic integration rules},
journal = {Journal of Open Source Software}
}
It would be useful to have a bibtex reference available on the https://rulebasedintegration.org/ site to make it easier (and also uniform) to reference the use of Rubi.