In the attached file, nfsim and ssa/ode simulations produce different results. The cause is likely to be in the reverse reaction
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) + C(c1) kr
NFSim becomes confused between
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) + C(c1) kr where B and C
where C and A are not bound together and
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) .C(c1) kr
Where C and A still maintain a bond. While network expansion distinguishes between the two correctly and only triggers the event specified by the user.
In the attached file, nfsim and ssa/ode simulations produce different results. The cause is likely to be in the reverse reaction
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) + C(c1) kr
NFSim becomes confused between
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) + C(c1) kr where B and C
where C and A are not bound together and
B(b1!1).C(c1!1) -> B(b1) .C(c1) kr
Where C and A still maintain a bond. While network expansion distinguishes between the two correctly and only triggers the event specified by the user.
odevsnf.bngl.txt