Closed rhclark closed 6 years ago
Comment by rhclark: I see what you mean by adding component states for Issue 202, and I also see that the Molecule Types section shows that the beta component is supposed to have states. I suppose the right way to handle this issue would be to put out a message warning the user that they failed to specify a state for beta. I'm not sure, though, how much work that would be.
Comment by jrfaeder:
t’s allowed not to refer to the component states, so there doesn’t need to be a warning. I’m guessing that the contact map in rulebender doesn’t handle that case though.
seems to be fixed in version 2.2.1
John Sekar sent in a .bngl file that is remarkably similar to fceri.bngl but has some subtle differences in the component binding sites and phosphorylation sites of one of the molecules. This molecule also occurs twice on both the right and left hand side of certain rules, and all this together creates a scenario that RuleBender cannot handle. The .bngl file is below: