Closed nsahoo closed 4 years ago
The Psi' trigger trigger is between 3.3 - 4.0 GeV. So, I do not understand the events with trigger 2. But, I do not see any dip at the trigger intersections in these plots.
I think the dip he sees could be due to the J/psi and psi' rejection cuts. Probably, he has made them more tight as compared to us.
Yes, but if he applies the PSi rejection cuts, then the corresponding q2 regions will not show up because you're rejecting all events there. @Rishabh and @Samarendra: can you guys check this ?
👍
Additional variables/branches saved in the tuple for different trigger categories used while tuple processing. These additional branches are: Trig_LMNR , Trig_JPSI and Trig_PSIP meant for LMNR+trk, JPSi+trk and PSi'+trk trigger categories. They are set to 1 for events passing each individual triggers.
Please find some validation plots below.
[ signal mc, full q2 region with individual triggers cut applied ]
[ signal mc, full q2 region with triggers cut applied ]
[ signal mc, full q2 region with LMNR triggers cut applied ]
[ signal mc, full q2 region with PSI resonant triggers cut applied ]
[ signal mc, plotting "triggers" variable ]
[ signal mc, why triggers variable shows value == 2 ? ]
This is because the PSi' trigger does trigger up to ~4.1 GeV/c2 where LMNR trigger also overlaps, that's why for these small fraction of events we are getting triggers==2. There is NOTHING wrong. It's completely understood.
My conclusion: I won't expect any dip in dimuon mass or q2 plots (which was forwarded by Samarendra today).
Please do let me know your point-of-view, you can write your comments below. If you're fully convinced, I'll merge this PR.
n.