Closed piedoom closed 2 years ago
Hmm, I don't know... I have a handful of crates using vst-rs
, and none of them use any of these crates.
Isn't re-exporting most customarily used when types from a dependency appear in the API of a crate? Is that the case here?
I would argue that we do, as parameters are accessed via a numeric ID, and I think tagged enums are the idiomatic way to do such in rust. We don't explicitly require it as part of the API but I think it is heavily implied to keep things readable. All that being said, i've since learned the bigger picture re: licensing issues with VST2 and don't think it's worth putting more work into this repo & instead redirecting it towards VST3 efforts/CLAP so might just close this in any case
I don't think there's much benefit to re-exporting these crates, since they're not exposed in any part of the public crate API. If users need the same functionality they can just those crates as a dependency, and if the versions are compatible Cargo will only include one copy of them anyway.
Given the crate consumer will very likely be constructing their own tagged enums, should we re-export both the crates we use internally since they'll likely be imported anyways?