search

RutheniumVI / UnderTree

Latex editor made with git support in mind
MIT License
1 stars 1 forks source link

Team18 Review: More details on the verification plans #22

Closed marlon4dashen closed 1 year ago

marlon4dashen commented 2 years ago

Hi, all! It is a great VnV plan overall. But I noticed that the verification plans (part4) lack details. First of all, in 4.1 Verification and Validation Team, the role and responsibility of each member are not explicitly defined. For example, who will be responsible for backend testing and who will be for frontend testing, etc. Additionally, in sections 4.2 and 4.3, it's great that you mentioned to verify through peer reviews and feedback. However, the approach is not specified. What's the structure of the reviews? Can it be ad hoc, or even better structured? One suggestion is to also use a checklist in the design verification plan by asking architectural questions regarding your designs.

qureshe00 commented 1 year ago

Updated sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3