Closed vincentjames501 closed 2 years ago
Additionally, bumping jsonista will resolve a few w/in their library!
Sounds good. Certainly I don't want any reflection warnings in clj-okhttp. I have also been thinking about moving the ssl namespace out into a separate library and just referencing it here.
@RutledgePaulV , I think that namespace is super handy! Especially if you don't want to merge the :insecure?
option 😉.
When loading the clj-okhttp.core namespace in our project, we're getting the following: