mapToVoid

[asam139]

Name and description

Add mapToVoid to map any observable type to void.

Motivation for inclusion

I am tired to see map { _ in } in the code

Example of use

myObserver.mapToVoid() in place of myObserver.map { _ in }

Code

public extension ObservableType { 
    func mapToVoid() -> Observable<Void> {
        return map { _ in }
    }
}

[freak4pc]

Hey @asam139 - I appreciate the sentiment, and we actually have this operator in our own codebase. However, it feels a bit too opinionated from one hand, and too trivial on the other hand.

Meaning, it is not helpful or wanted for everyone, but it takes a second to add it if you're interested (similarly to mapTrue(), mapFalse(), mapOptional() and other tidbits we like and use in our code base).

WDYT ?

[asam139]

Ok, you've convinced me 🤣, I will add to my own extensions.