The version 3.13.0 is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Release Notesv3.13.0
cd4c025 Update: add fixer for no-extra-label (#7840) (Teddy Katz)
Not sure how things should work exactly?
There is a collection of [frequently asked questions](https://greenkeeper.io/faq.html) and of course you may always [ask my humans](https://github.com/greenkeeperio/greenkeeper/issues/new).
Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling b66055983a9d872f2fed960eb835fdcb36145c32 on greenkeeper/eslint-3.13.0 into 91f04dbf52f05a4a1b7fec72122dea9bc7447a1f on master.
Version 3.13.0 of eslint just got published.
The version 3.13.0 is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint. Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Release Notes
v3.13.0no-unneeded-ternary
(#7540) (Teddy Katz)padded-blocks
never
case (fixes #7868) (#7878) (alberto)operator-linebreak
(#7702) (Teddy Katz)return
argument (fixes #7594) (#7595) (Dalton Santos)semi
false positive before regex/template literals (fixes #7782) (#7783) (Teddy Katz)prefer-destructuring
rule (fixes #6053) (#7741) (Alex LaFroscia)Commits
The new version differs by 43 commits .
8571ab8
3.13.0
d54e0c1
Build: package.json and changelog update for 3.13.0
cd4c025
Update: add fixer for no-extra-label (#7840)
aa75c92
Fix: Ensure prefer-const fixes destructuring assignments (fixes #7852) (#7859)
4008022
Chore: Refactor to use ES6 Classes (Part 3)(refs #7849) (#7865)
c9ba40a
Update: add fixer for
no-unneeded-ternary
(#7540)dd56d87
Update: add object-shorthand option for arrow functions (fixes #7564) (#7746)
fbafdc0
Docs:
padded-blocks
never
case (fixes #7868) (#7878)ca1f841
Fix: no-useless-return stack overflow on loops after throw (fixes #7855) (#7856)
d80d994
Update: add fixer for object-property-newline (fixes #7740) (#7808)
bf3ea3a
Fix: capitalized-comments: Ignore consec. comments if first is invalid (#7835)
616611a
Chore: Refactor to use ES6 Classes (Part 2)(refs #7849) (#7847)
856084b
Chore: Refactor to use ES6 Classes (Part 1)(refs #7849) (#7846)
bf45893
Docs: Clarify that we only support Stage 4 proposals (#7845)
0fc24f7
Fix: adapt new-paren rule so it handles TypeScript (fixes #7817) (#7820)
There are 43 commits in total. See the full diff.
Not sure how things should work exactly?
There is a collection of [frequently asked questions](https://greenkeeper.io/faq.html) and of course you may always [ask my humans](https://github.com/greenkeeperio/greenkeeper/issues/new).Your Greenkeeper Bot :palm_tree: