SAA-SDT / eas-schemas

Where TS-EAS manages EAD, EAC-CPF, and any other schemas published by the subcommittee.
0 stars 0 forks source link

Integrate <archref> and <bibref> with <reference> #46

Closed kerstarno closed 9 months ago

kerstarno commented 1 year ago

Creator of issue

  1. Kerstin Arnold
  2. EAD team lead, TS-EAS
  3. @kerstarno
  4. kerstin.arnold@archivesportaleurope.net

The issue relates to

Wanted change/feature

Note for working on and testing this issue: When the schema changes are done in development branch, please mark this by ticking the box for the higher level in the list (printed in bold); once the changes have been tested successfully please mark this by ticking the box on the lower and intermediate (printed in italics) levels.

MicheleCombs commented 1 year ago

Not sure where this request came from, but archref is really useful to us. We use it to reference other of our archival collections within relatedmaterial. This allows us to use an abbreviated URL (i.e. just the file name) and then, based on the fact that it's an archref, automatically generate the correct prefix. This is super helpful since sometimes our finding aids get moved en masse, and we have to alter the path to them, which we can easily do globally just by changing our XSL, This would be much harder to do with just extref (which technically isn't the correct element anyway, since these are not external references, they are references within our repository/institution). So, it would be nice if we could keep archref.

kerstarno commented 1 year ago

Thanks for the feedback, Michele. It's always good to have real-world examples. I'd think it would be possible to do what you described also with <reference> as the context of <relatedMaterial> would already indicate that these are archival references, but for now this issue is only up for review (see labelling) and not decided yet. :-)

MicheleCombs commented 1 year ago

Not necessarily -- we also sometimes include, in relatedmaterial, links to resources that are not our own archival collections. It might be an archival collection at another repository, or a website, or a digital collection, and so on. Thus we would not be able to assume that all references within relatedmaterial would be archrefs.

kerstarno commented 1 year ago

Thanks again, Michele. Would you maybe have an encoding example that you could add here? Just an example for <relatedMaterial> that includes links to your own archival resources and archival resources from other institutions and maybe also some generic resources as well.

MicheleCombs commented 1 year ago

Sure! Take a look at the Related Materials section of our Grove Press finding aid. That one has a little bit of everything :)

kerstarno commented 1 year ago

Thanks, Michele. Would you have the EAD XML encoding for this example as well by any chance? If it's not online somewhere, please feel free to send it to me via email (kerstin.arnold@archivesportaleurope.net). Would be great to have this for the EAD team meeting next week.

MicheleCombs commented 1 year ago

Sure - you can find the ead code for all our finding aids here https://library.syracuse.edu/ead/xml/ This one is grove_press.xml The links to our collections and to the archival collections at other repositories are encoded as part of relatedmaterial, The link to the catalog, to find books that were removed for cataloging, is encoded as part of separatedmaterial. Both are displayed in the HTML version in the section entitled "Related Material" in the interests of not confusing end users, who won't care about the arcane differences between related and separated :)

kerstarno commented 1 year ago

As a note to be taken into account during the further review of this issue:

The example of the Syracuse University finding aid uses EAD 2002 (DTD). With regard to <archref> and <bibref> this highlights a main difference between EAD 2002 and EAD3, as in EAD3 neither of these two elements allows for linking attributes anymore. One would need to apply the following encoding to get to the same effect, which already requires the use of <ref> in order to include links. Same for <extref>, which doesn't exist in EAD3 anymore.

<relatedmaterial>
  <head>Related Material</head>
  <p>For additional material related to Grove Press, see also the following: 
    <list>
      <item>
        <!-- <arch --><ref href="wainhouse_a.htm">Austryn Wainhouse Papers<!-- </arch --></ref>
      </item>
      <item>
        <!-- <arch --><ref href="glass_int.htm">Loren Glass Interviews Relating to Grove Press<!-- </arch --></ref>
      </item>
      <item>
        <!-- <arch --><ref href="deardoff.htm">Kenneth Deardoff Collection Relating to Grove Press<!-- </arch --></ref>
      </item>
      <item>
        <!-- <arch --><ref href="prix.htm">Prix Formentor Collection<!-- </arch --></ref>, which contains materials about the Prix International and Prix Formentor literary prizes.
      </item>
      <item>
        <!-- <arch --><ref href="creative.htm">Creative Film Foundation Records<!-- </arch --></ref>
      </item>
    </list>
  </p>
  <p>
    <!-- <ext --><ref href="http://findingaids.cul.columbia.edu/ead/nnc-rb/ldpd_7953908/summary">Barney Rosset's personal papers<!-- </ext --></ref> are housed at the Columbia University Rare Book and Manuscript Library, which also has a small <!-- <arch --><ref href="http://findingaids.cul.columbia.edu/ead/nnc-rb/ldpd_10553502/summary">Grove Press Collection<!-- </arch --></ref>.
  </p>
</relatedmaterial>
kerstarno commented 10 months ago

During their meeting in Washington on 26 July 2023, the EAD sub-team decided to move forward with this change. In addition to <reference> opening up the option of linking again, which EAD3 had removed from <archref> and <bibref>, the content model of those elements currently including <archref> and <bibref> in EAD3 also will be extended (see #69) by enabling <relations> as a direct sub-element of <otherFindAid>, <publicationNote> (renamed from <bibliography>), <relatedMaterial>, and <separatedMaterial>. The respective sub-elements that become available with this will allow for a more explicit description as well as categorisation/typing of the related materials referenced than was possible so far.

kerstarno commented 10 months ago

Tested with the XSD and the RNG and can confirm that this has been implemented as expected. The four elements in question now also include the <relations> element, which would allow for detailing various types of related materials/resources that one might want to reference in these elements.