Closed kerstarno closed 8 months ago
Following the revised discussion of #24 at the Washington meeting on 24 July 2023,
<dateRange>
as a direct sub-element of <accessConditions>
<dateRange>
as a direct sub-element of <useConditions>
For documentation, ensure that a variety of use cases is covered, e.g. time-bound dates (“until 2100”), ambiguous dates (“until death of donor”), perpetual dates (“forever”).
dateRange is now available here in https://github.com/SAA-SDT/eas-schemas/tree/issue_60
Following the EAD sub-team's decision during their September 2023 meeting:
@valueURI
, @vocabularySource
, and @vocabularySourceURI
to <accessConditions>
@valueURI
, @vocabularySource
, and @vocabularySourceURI
to <useConditions>
Tested with the XSD and the RNG. It seems that the initial change to add <dateRange>
was never merged to the development branch, so this is missing from the current version. The name change and the addition of the vocabulary attributes, on the other hand, can be confirmed.
I deleted the old "issue_60" branch and created a new one with the same name based on the current "development" branch as there've been quite some changes in the last three months. I created a pull request for this (#83), which I hope won't collide with the other pull requests of today. Once this has been merged, this issue will need another round of testing.
Re-tested with the XSD and the RNG and can confirm that <accessConditions>
and <useConditions>
now both include <dateRange>
as an optional sub-element.
Creator of issue
The issue relates to
Wanted change/feature
Text:
<accessrestrict>
and<userestrict>
should be renamed to<accessConditions>
and<useConditions>
respectively. Along with the renaming, the following should be considered:Note for working on and testing this issue: When the schema changes are done in development branch, please mark the tasks on the highest levels of the list (printed in bold) by ticking the box. When the changes have been tested successfully, please mark the tasks on the lowest level of the list.
<accessrestrict>
to<accessConditions>
<userestrict>
to<useConditions>