Open AlexaVillaume opened 10 years ago
Hi Alexa.
good point. Historically, people have been using iraf/daophot which does aperture photometry. The problem with aperture photometry is that it only works for round point-sources. With the advent of large surveys, astronomers switched to sextractor because it takes care of elongation, axis ratios and it looks for the best aperture radius through mag_auto
.
Bright UCDs look more like galaxies and some of them are elongated. If measured with aperture photometry, UCD magnitudes may be underestimated.
So, I think the way to go is to use mag_auto
to measure magnitudes of all objects.
Once we have the final catalogue for M60, we can test if the magnitudes measured at the best-aperture radius (as from findBestAperture) is indeed equal to mag_auto. If it is, then mag_auto does a job as good as findBestAperture.
Moreover, we know a bounce of UCDs in M60 because they have HST photometry. So we can test how aperture photometry affects their magnitudes. Then we can decide how to proceed.
Hey @vincepota -
I've been thinking about the findBestAperture routine, I don't know if it's optimized for UCDs. Do you have any thoughts on how to optimize the aperture for objects as bright as UCDs?