Closed rukayaj closed 7 years ago
rukayaj
commented
7 years ago For mammals: Relton C. 2016. A conservation assessment of Balaenoptera acutorostrata subsp. In Child MF, Roxburgh L, Do Linh San E, Raimondo D, Davies-Mostert HT, editors. The Red List of Mammals of South Africa, Swaziland and Lesotho. South African National Biodiversity Institute and Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa.
rukayaj
commented
7 years ago List of taxonomic references to use Dragonfly - National assessments and all Dragonfly images SAMWAYS, M.J. & SIMAIKA, J.P. 2016. Manual of Freshwater Assessment for South Africa: Dragonfly Biotic Index. Suricata 2. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
Reptiles
Author. year. Species. In M.F. Bate, W.R. Branch, A.M. Bauer, M. Burger, J. Marias, G.J. Alexander & M.S. de Villiers (eds), Atlas and Red List of Reptiles of South Africa, Lesothos and Swaziland. Suricata 1. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
Butterflies
Author. Year. Species. In: Mecenero, S., Ball, J.B., Edge, D.A., Hamer, M.L., Henning, G.A., Kruger, M., Pringle, E.L., Terblanche, R.F. & Williams, M.C. (eds). 2013. Conservation assessment of butterflies of South Africa, Lesothos and Swaziland: Red List and atlas. Saftronics (Pty) Ltd., Johannesburg & Animal Demography Unit, Cape Town.
Birds Author. Year. Species. In: The Eskom Red Data Book of Birds of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Taylor, MR, Peacock F, Wanless RW (eds). BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Line Fish
Rose Thornycroft, 2017, Seriola rivoliana Valenciennes, 1833, SeaKeys species page.
Author. Year. Species. Seakeys species page.
All SIS exports:
Dragonflies– excluding the National assessments 47 that will use Dragonfly book. Amphibians Mammals Freshwater Fish
General format: note sure whether all assessments will be published online but a large number should be, the more recent assessment won’t be on the IUCN website, hence no web link. I have checked in the export whether there is a field with the citation, but I assume it is generate on the website and not captured in the database
Author. Year. Species. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Year of assessment). Link to the species page. Downloaded on date to be generated.
Example: Impson, D. & Swartz, E. 2007. Barbus serra. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2007:e.T2569A9456404. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2007.RLTS.T2569A9456404.en. Downloaded on 09 March 2017. Website general reference for assessments first published on the website:
Author. Year. Species. Website name. South African Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. Link to specific species page. Downloaded on date.
Linefish is the only candidate – but I think we will need input from Prideel and co, before the final decision is made. So I think we use the Seakeys reference in the meantime.
Book references without reference to a specific species as alternative if specific species reference is not used – to just have it as a general citation at the bottom of each applicable taxonomic group.
Butterflies Mecenero, S., Ball, J.B., Edge, D.A., Hamer, M.L., Henning, G.A., Kruger, M., Pringle, E.L., Terblanche, R.F. & Williams, M.C. (eds). 2013. Conservation assessment of butterflies of South Africa, Lesothos and Swaziland: Red List and atlas. Saftronics (Pty) Ltd., Johannesburg & Animal Demography Unit, Cape Town.
Reptiles BATES, M.F., BRANCH, W.R., BAUER, A.M., BURGER, M., MARIAS, J., ALEXANDER, G.J. & DE VILLIERS, M.S. (eds). 2014 (reprint 2014). Atlas and Red List of Reptiles of South Africa, Lesothos and Swaziland. Suricata 1. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
They suggested some complicated thing where they have different citation styles per order/class. I said they should make it simple. Tilla is supposed to reply saying what we go with.