Closed 3cpt closed 3 years ago
I know that the rest of the data in repos.json is definitely mocked - especially as SAP is likely not in the business of maintaining planets :))
So I would assume that the scores in that file are mocked too.
In the crawler implementation that I started (in a separate repo) I am not calculating the mentioned repository-activity-score yet either, but rather something super simplistic as a placeholder. However you were game to help adding the real activity-score calculation to that, that would be awesome 😄
I know that the rest of the data in repos.json is definitely mocked - especially as SAP is likely not in the business of maintaining planets :))
We never know, the sky isn't the limit anymore! 😄
In the crawler implementation that I started (in a separate repo) I am not calculating the mentioned repository-activity-score yet either, but rather something super simplistic as a placeholder. However you were game to help adding the real activity-score calculation to that, that would be awesome 😄
I saw that implementation and the comment too. My question is because I'm studying the algorithm trying to match with some real cases. I need to be sure that I found some parts in the pattern example that need to be fixed - need to open an Issue in the InnerSourceCommons patterns repo. 😅
And if I had time I will try to implement the algorithm in Ruby - nice opportunity to learn - as I'm doing to the innersource-crawler
Thanks
Hehe nice, you already found all the right places.
Looking forward to see you on the InnerSourcePatterns repo then, as I am involved with that too :)
Hi. How do you calculate the score? I was trying to test the repository-activity-score pattern algorithm against the
repos.json
but I don't get the same values?Is the data mocked, including the
score
?Thanks