13. Slide #12, if we build solutions based on these requirements, these requirements are not specific enough. E.g., the small overhead requirement, we need to quantify. From Alvaro [during ietf 115] #13
Response and revision summary: Thanks for the suggestion. Some more descriptions about the concrete requirements have been added to the draft. But, we found it is difficult to quantify the requirements. Instead, we present some baselines in the requirements. For example, “in the case of asymmetric routing, new mechanisms MUST avoid improper block problems of strict uRPF and have fewer improper permit problems than existing uRPF-based mechanisms (e.g., strict uRPF and loose uRPF)”.
Response and revision summary: Thanks for the suggestion. Some more descriptions about the concrete requirements have been added to the draft. But, we found it is difficult to quantify the requirements. Instead, we present some baselines in the requirements. For example, “in the case of asymmetric routing, new mechanisms MUST avoid improper block problems of strict uRPF and have fewer improper permit problems than existing uRPF-based mechanisms (e.g., strict uRPF and loose uRPF)”.