SAVNET-ProblemStatement-Architecture / Inter-domain-problem-statement

3 stars 0 forks source link

15. Remove “EFP-uRPF” from the SAVNET work: Don’t use hypothetical protocols like EFP-uRPF as a foundation for the SAVNET Work. EFP-uRPF is a theory. There has never been an effort to code EFP-uRPF. From Barry Greene [after ietf 115] #15

Open XiaoTianCan opened 1 year ago

XiaoTianCan commented 1 year ago

Response and revision summary: RFC8704 takes a gap analysis on existing SAV mechanisms and proposes EFP-uRPF to narrow the gaps. Since EFP-uRPF is an improved mechanism and is also standardized, our draft does an analysis on EFP-uRPF. At the same time, the draft was revised to point out that EFP-uRPF has not been implemented so that people can learn about the current status of EFP-uRPF.