unjustifiedZeroDBH

[ValentineHerr]

Census crew,

tag 10704 stemtag 2 is showing up with error unjustifiedZeroDBH bcause it has dbh = 0 but it is LI and has no codes. In the note it says DBH 337. Why was the DBH not entered int the appropriate spot?

[krystalbagnaschi]

We were getting an error that the dbh had to be between 0 and 200, and would not let us submit with a dbh of 337. We took a photo that I think Iris sent to Jess, as well as a screenshot on the iPad.

[jess-shue]

@krystalbagnaschi I'll fix that - I had DBH limits set for cm; it was corrected on the tree table but not the stem table. Will it be OK to push that correction this morning, or should it wait?

[mitreds]

If you can do before 830am proceeds please, if not can be at that hour is better to wait when we return From the field

Obtener Outlook para Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg

---

From: jess-shue @.> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 7:44:14 AM To: SCBI-ForestGEO/2023census @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: Re: [SCBI-ForestGEO/2023census] unjustifiedZeroDBH for tag 10704 stemtag 2 (Issue #29)

External Email - Exercise Caution

@krystalbagnaschihttps://github.com/krystalbagnaschi I'll fix that - I had DBH limits set for cm; it was corrected on the tree table but not the stem table. Will it be OK to push that correction this morning, or should it wait?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/SCBI-ForestGEO/2023census/issues/29#issuecomment-1508380335, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A7DSWHQDTO7THZ2KSMETSFLXBE2A5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAW5VKZYU. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

[jess-shue]

@mitreds Should be fixed - I did reload the map on my iPad and was able to enter a DBH over 200 on a secondary stem.

[ValentineHerr]

These were all addressed this morning but one (tag 52025, @krystalbagnaschi, looks like it was in your quadrat, 0517)