SCBI-ForestGEO / McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation

repository for linking the climate sensitity of tree growth (derived from cores) to functional traits
0 stars 0 forks source link

Fig. 3 and associated analysis #127

Closed teixeirak closed 3 years ago

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

@mcgregorian1 , for Fig. 3, could you please:

The text in the results on this figure currently reads, "Drought resistance also varied across species, overall and in each drought year (Fig. 3). " Could you please add stats to this?

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

In this case do you mean running an anova on Rt ~ sp all together as well as per drought year, and then adding all four sets of grouping labels?

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Since the plot just shows the individual droughts, we wouldn't show the grouping labels for droughts combined.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Ok so I'll do something similar to this and color code the groupings

image

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Right. Basically the plot you have, with corresponding color-coded letters above each box.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

This is saved as Figure 3

image

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

I'll also update the description in the results like you mentioned.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

The text in the results on this figure currently reads, "Drought resistance also varied across species, overall and in each drought year (Fig. 3). " Could you please add stats to this?

@teixeirak currently the text reads "The development of tree-ring chronologies for the twelve most dominant tree species at our site [@helcoski_growing_2019; @bourg_initial_2013] gave us the sample size to compare historical drought responses across species (Fig. 3) and associated traits at a single site [see also @elliott_forest_2015]. "

Did you still want me to add something here?

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Figure looks awesome; thanks!

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

@teixeirak currently the text reads "The development of tree-ring chronologies for the twelve most dominant tree species at our site [@helcoski_growing_2019; @bourg_initial_2013] gave us the sample size to compare historical drought responses across species (Fig. 3) and associated traits at a single site [see also @elliott_forest_2015]. "

Did you still want me to add something here?

You're looking in the discussion section. The sentence I quoted should be as quoted (or close) in the results.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Ah, ok. I searched "Fig. 3" in the doc but it didn't show up. I'll check again

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

@teixeirak am I good to push changes soon?

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Yes, anytime. (Note that pushing would never mess things up, but working on it simultaneously could create conflicted copies that are a pain to resolve. I'm not working on it now.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Ok!

Also does this sound ok?

"Drought resistance also varied across species, overall and in each drought year (Fig. 3). Significant differences in $Rt$ across species were most abundant in 1966 with a total of seven distinct groupings, while 1977 had four and 1999 had two."

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Sounds great! But maybe change "abundant" to "pronounced".

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Cool it's updated. I'm going to get a little packing done and then focus on the references for most of tonight unless you have something more pressing (I think I've addressed the other stuff?).