Add density plots for resilience (and recovery?) to Fig. 1

[teixeirak]

3- add density plots for resilience and recovery to Fig. 1 (not bad, but tricky space-wise)

I've added standalone Fig 1b's for each metric along with a separate Fig 1 for each so you can see them. You're right, I'm not entirely sure...We could do 2 columns, with the timeseries in 1 and then have each density plot on top of each other in the second?

_Originally posted by @mcgregorian1 in https://github.com/SCBI-ForestGEO/McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation/issues/131#issuecomment-688577537_

[teixeirak]

@mcgregorian1,

• [x] As discussed in issue #131, I don't think we need to show all 3 metrics. Let's show just Rt and Rs here. If you make the plots narrower, it should fit.
• [x] Since Rs uses the 5 years post-drought, let's also highlight those years in 1a, perhaps with a slightly lighter shade, or ssome sort of stippling.

[mcgregorian1]

I've been playing around with this and there doesn't seem to be an easy way for me to make the density plots smaller and fit underneath the timeseries figure - I think it has to do with Valentine making the timeseries a set margin so everything could fit.

[teixeirak]

It's okay; just make each panel separate, and we can combine them manually. Please make the density plots much narrower (square plot space), and reduce font size on those plots by a lot (to match chronology plot).

[mcgregorian1]

@teixeirak turns out I was mistaken yesterday and the figure did fit, I just didn't actually write it out to png to see this.

Otherwise I added the post-drought years to Fig1a, the final figure is updated. I think it should be good now?

[teixeirak]

Looks fantastic! But one little cosmetic thing: could you please make (b) and (c) the same size? You could fit the legend in the upper right corner of the plot for (c).

[mcgregorian1]

Done! Thanks for the suggestion

[teixeirak]

Looks great; thanks!