minor SI things

[teixeirak]

• [x] @teixeirak , update dAIC criteria (see reviewer comment)
• [x] @mcgregorian1 , insert year coefficients in footnotes for tables S10 (Rc) and S11 (Rs): "Year was included in the model for all drought years, but its effect was not included in any top models, and coefficients were small(1966: 0, 1977: -0.03, 1999:0.008; same values in all top models).11"
• [x] @mcgregorian1 , add marginal R2 to Table S9
• [x] @mcgregorian1 , for tables S9-S11, when there are no terms in the model, the coefficient in the "no variables" column is the intercept. Please move it to the intercept column and delete the last column.
• [x] @mcgregorian1 , in tables S10-S11, fix text on "conditional R2"

[mcgregorian1]

• [x] @mcgregorian1 , insert year coefficients in footnotes for tables S10 (Rc) and S11 (Rs): "Year was included in the model for all drought years, but its effect was not included in any top models, and coefficients were small(1966: 0, 1977: -0.03, 1999:0.008; same values in all top models).11"

So we actually did have year be in top models in general (for the full data), but we had decided at one point to not include "year" in the table of coefficients (Table S6 eg). Do you want those back in?

[teixeirak]

So we actually did have year be in top models in general (for the full data), but we had decided at one point to not include "year" in the table of coefficients (Table S6 eg). Do you want those back in?

We had decided to put it in the footnote. Look at the tableS and you’ll See what I mean.

.

[mcgregorian1]

Sorry yes I meant that I'll change the language saying that year was not in any of the top models, because it was for Rc and Rs