SCBI-ForestGEO / McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation

repository for linking the climate sensitity of tree growth (derived from cores) to functional traits
0 stars 0 forks source link

Edits for production #150

Closed teixeirak closed 3 years ago

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

External Email - Exercise Caution

05-Oct-2020 Dear Dr Anderson-Teixeira

Professor Andrea Polle has passed your article 'Tree height and leaf drought tolerance traits shape growth responses across droughts in a temperate broadleaf forest' NPH-MS-2020-34010.R1 through to me as accepted. Although your article has been accepted for publication it is now being returned to your Author Centre on ScholarOne Manuscripts for you to review and make final adjustments and corrections to the files before production.

Please respond to the specific points listed below, then follow the instructions at the end of this email message for uploading your final files. Please upload your final files within 2 working days of receipt of this email - any delay in uploading files may hold up the publication of your article. If you cannot upload your files within 2 working days, or if you foresee any problems, do let us know. (Of course, at the current time, any delays are not a problem.)

1) Please make the following changes to the main text file and then upload your final file in Word format (unfortunately, it is not possible to typeset articles from pdf format):

a) Title page:

b) It is journal style that figures should be cited in the main text in numerical order. At present, Fig. 4 is mentioned before Fig. 3.

c) Acknowledgements:

This has been checked.

d) Author contributions:

e) ORCID:

f) References:

g) Fig. 1 text reads ‘Figure modified from Helcoski et al. (2019)’.

h) Fig. 3,

i) Fig. 4,

2) Figs 1-4.

I confirm that all four figures will appear in colour in your published article.

3) Supporting Information Figs S1-S7, Methods S1, Tables S1-S11 (uploaded .docx file). Address the following points:

4) Licence/copyright form: please note that you will be contacted by the publisher in due course regarding the licence/copyright form for your article. Once your article has been received by Wiley for production you will receive an email from Wiley’s Author Services system which will ask you to log in and will present you with the appropriate license for completion. At this point you can elect to publish your article in the regular way, in which case your Abstract will be available free from the point of publication and the full article available through a subscription; or choose an Open Access option. If you have any questions regarding Open Access, please do not hesitate to get in touch with us directly. Note, your article cannot be published until the publisher has received the appropriate signed license agreement.

5) Finally, we remind authors that new sequence data should be deposited in the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ Nucleotide Sequence Databases, and accession numbers should be included in the final publication. In addition, please note that New Phytologist requires authors to ensure that data integral to the paper is available to readers in a form which allows for verification and replication of the results in the paper. For full details please refer to the author guidelines: https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fhub%2Fjournal%2F14698137%2Fabout%2Fauthor-guidelines&data=02%7C01%7CTeixeiraK%40si.edu%7C72bd5362ccce42dab22608d8692216c8%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C1%7C637374942418072799&sdata=3FMdYgPRS7Q4wkZORH9pqJkRwbq762hNeInqtPxbMJo%3D&reserved=0.

Thank you for your contribution to New Phytologist. I look forward to hearing from you shortly regarding the files for production, and do get in contact if you have any queries relating to the above points.

Best wishes Nichola Hetherington


Dr NICHOLA HETHERINGTON
Production Manager, New Phytologist

New Phytologist Central Office, Bailrigg House, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YE, UK
Tel + 44 1524 594691; Email n.hetherington@lancaster.ac.uk
teixeirak commented 3 years ago
1. Please make the following changes to the main text file and then upload your final file in Word format (unfortunately, it is not possible to typeset articles from pdf format):

@mcgregorian1 , I've switched the main manuscript to word output, so that's easy. We will need to convert the main text tables, though.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

• insert postal code information for affiliation 3.

There is none.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

b) It is journal style that figures should be cited in the main text in numerical order. At present, Fig. 4 is mentioned before Fig. 3. Please reorder/renumber these two figures throughout so that the figures are cited in order 1 to 4.

@mcgregorian1 , up to you.

FIg 4 is first cited here:

Tree height, microenvironment, and drought tolerance

Taller trees (based on $H$ in the drought year) showed stronger growth reductions during drought (i.e., lower $Rt$) and less rebound following drought (i.e., lower $Rc$ and $Rs$; Table 1; Fig. 4).

If we want to keep the same figure order, the thing to do would be to add a citation to Fig. 3 in "Community-level drought responses " above.

But, I think I'd favor switching 3 and 4. I think 4 is your most important figure, so it doesn't hurt to have it closer to the front.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

c) Acknowledgements: please check your Acknowledgements section to ensure that details of funding bodies and grant numbers are complete and correct.

I've checked this.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

@mcgregorian1 , I believe I've dealt with the ones your most likely to have questions on.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

@teixeirak it turns out we had so many things to fix for the citations because for whatever reason the new-phytologist.csl wasn't giving us the correct citation output. When I removed the csl line, all the correct information appeared. I also went back and changed some sources that had erroneous page numbers from Zotero.

I created a test_refs file if you want to try making other changes.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

b) It is journal style that figures should be cited in the main text in numerical order. At present, Fig. 4 is mentioned before Fig. 3. Please reorder/renumber these two figures throughout so that the figures are cited in order 1 to 4.

@mcgregorian1 , up to you.

FIg 4 is first cited here:

Tree height, microenvironment, and drought tolerance

Taller trees (based on $H$ in the drought year) showed stronger growth reductions during drought (i.e., lower $Rt$) and less rebound following drought (i.e., lower $Rc$ and $Rs$; Table 1; Fig. 4).

If we want to keep the same figure order, the thing to do would be to add a citation to Fig. 3 in "Community-level drought responses " above.

But, I think I'd favor switching 3 and 4. I think 4 is your most important figure, so it doesn't hurt to have it closer to the front.

That makes sense. I've done that switch

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago
1. Please make the following changes to the main text file and then upload your final file in Word format (unfortunately, it is not possible to typeset articles from pdf format):

@mcgregorian1 , I've switched the main manuscript to word output, so that's easy. We will need to convert the main text tables, though.

This is done - I had mostly finished this earlier so all I needed to do was one table

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Quick comment on citations

@teixeirak remaining questions:

insert text into the legend (Fig 4) to explain the horizontal lines, ranges and circles in the box plots (as it is journal style that figures should stand alone from the main text).

Upload separate, high resolution files for the four figures in formats for production (Wiley recommend using 600 dpi TIFF or Encapsulated PostScript (EPS) for line art, and 300 dpi TIFF for continuous tone, but figures can also be set from Word (.doc), pdf and other formats including ppt).

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

This is done - I had mostly finished this earlier so all I needed to do was one table

Where are these tables?

teixeirak commented 3 years ago
* I was just going to export these at 300dpi (so 118ppi) from R as pngs; is that still ok?

should be fine

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Ohh you're talking about the main tables. I had been talking about the SI tables...I'll finish the main tables later today.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 10:35 AM Kristina Anderson-Teixeira < notifications@github.com> wrote:

This is done - I had mostly finished this earlier so all I needed to do was one table

Where are these tables?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SCBI-ForestGEO/McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation/issues/150#issuecomment-704311941, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJNRBEMXDJNW6SRLHLQUIADSJMTJHANCNFSM4SEUYKJA .

--

Ian McGregor

Ph.D. Student | Center for Geospatial Analytics

He/Him/His

College of Natural Resources

Jordan Hall 4120 | Campus Box 7106

North Carolina State University

2800 Faucette Dr.

Raleigh, NC 27695 USA imcgreg@ncsu.edu | 714-864-1005 | geospatial.ncsu.edu

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Ohh you're talking about the main tables. I had been talking about the SI tables...I'll finish the main tables later today.

Yes. The SI tables don't need any changes (unless specifically requested- I don't remember any such request).

teixeirak commented 3 years ago
* I was just going to export these at 300dpi (so 118ppi) from R as pngs; is that still ok?

should be fine

Please place these and any other files ready for submission in the 2020_10_for_production folder.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

insert text into the legend (Fig 4) to explain the horizontal lines, ranges and circles in the box plots (as it is journal style that figures should stand alone from the main text).

* Can you check on this for me please? I think it's fine but want to triple check.

I made some adjustments. Could you please make similar adjustments for Fig. S7?

teixeirak commented 3 years ago
* nsert a brief heading (< 93 characters) and any individual or lab-associated social media accounts (e.g. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, WeChat etc.) if available, which can be used for social media promotion of your article.

Ian, I take it that the "brief heading" is text that they'd put on twitter or such. I'll let you draft that.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Ian, I take it that the "brief heading" is text that they'd put on twitter or such. I'll let you draft that.

actually, I took a stab at it. See what you think.

I believe we have all the orcids now, and getting social media accounts isn't critical (won't wait on this)

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

@mcgregorian1 , I realized we need to send them a point-by-point response, so I've prepared one. I'm filling it in as if everything is done. Beyond the check boxes above, here's what's still missing:

1) Please make the following changes to the main text file and then upload your final file in Word format (unfortunately, it is not possible to typeset articles from pdf format):

This still needs to be done, including the tables and figure captions at the end.

5) Finally, we remind authors that new sequence data should be deposited in the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ Nucleotide Sequence Databases, and accession numbers should be included in the final publication. In addition, please note that New Phytologist requires authors to ensure that data integral to the paper is available to readers in a form which allows for verification and replication of the results in the paper. For full details please refer to the author guidelines: https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fhub%2Fjournal%2F14698137%2Fabout%2Fauthor-guidelines&amp;data=02%7C01%7CTeixeiraK%40si.edu%7C72bd5362ccce42dab22608d8692216c8%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C1%7C637374942418072799&amp;sdata=3FMdYgPRS7Q4wkZORH9pqJkRwbq762hNeInqtPxbMJo%3D&amp;reserved=0.

issue #79 , and make this repo public. We need to fill in the appropriate URLs/ DOIs

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Ian, I take it that the "brief heading" is text that they'd put on twitter or such. I'll let you draft that.

actually, I took a stab at it. See what you think.

I believe we have all the orcids now, and getting social media accounts isn't critical (won't wait on this)

Looks good to me. Honestly I'm not sure what they mean by that either; I've never seen it before

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Ohh you're talking about the main tables. I had been talking about the SI tables...I'll finish the main tables later today.

Yes. The SI tables don't need any changes (unless specifically requested- I don't remember any such request).

@teixeirak I've uploaded the new tables - much easier than I thought with a pdf -> word conversion. I wasn't sure if the original figures needed to be in there? I'm still going to export those separately.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

insert text into the legend (Fig 4) to explain the horizontal lines, ranges and circles in the box plots (as it is journal style that figures should stand alone from the main text).

* Can you check on this for me please? I think it's fine but want to triple check.

I made some adjustments. Could you please make similar adjustments for Fig. S7?

Done! Thank you for that.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Unfortunately, it looks like that didn't work very well for the tables--maybe more apparent on Mac than PC. Here are examples of what I'm seeing:

image image

I'm not sure if it's faster/ more reliable to do that conversion and then fix, or to just format the raw Excel tables. Unfortunately knitting tables into Word is one thing I haven't figured out how to do in GitHub yet... I just had to do this for a table on a paper of mine this AM, and went with the hand-formatting route. At least it only has to be done once after the paper is accepted!

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Wait that's so weird, though. This is what I see on my end (zoomed out)

image

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

See if you can turn on the gridlines. Here's where you'd do it on a Mac:

image
mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Ah I see what's happening. Shouldn't this be ok though? We just turn off gridlines?

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

I'm seeing from a quick check that we can't actually turn off gridlines, only choose to hide them. Unless you meant that the table should be changed such that everything is in one single table so even if gridlines are shown it's not wonky?

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

The journal will redo the figures in the main article, and for that they need a table that they can read.

For the SI, what we're sending is final, which is why we can just copy the pdf versions into the SI document.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Note that the tables we send them for production don't need to look pretty, but the content needs to be fully correct.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Yep! If you hide your gridlines, do the tables look ok?

I'm thinking as long as they're visibly ok when we toggle off gridlines then it should be fine?

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Figure legends will need to be copied over to the final word doc, and figures will be loaded as individual files. There won't be figures in the Word doc, just the legends.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Unfortunately, it's not an issue of being visibly okay (if it were we'd just use the pdf!). They'll basically re-create the table from scratch, exactly matching our content but applying their formatting rules.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Unfortunately, it's not an issue of being visibly okay (if it were we'd just use the pdf!). They'll basically re-create the table from scratch, exactly matching our content but applying their formatting rules.

Yes! What I meant was, can we send them a note asking them to turn off their gridlines when viewing the tables? If they're off then everything is easily viewable / readable.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

No, they'll want to copy-paste the data.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Gotcha

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

I'm currently getting Figs 1-4 as 300 dpi and putting them in the production folder.

I've put the tables and Fig 1-4 legends at the end of the references of the draft manuscript word doc - I'll now work on redoing the tables

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

OK, please be sure to rename or move the word file that you hand edit so that we don’t overwrite your changes. I think the main manuscript file is complete/ final.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

@teixeirak here is an example of Table 2 redone - since they will be recreating the table from scratch, do I need to put in the same formatting (i.e. border shading) or is this ok as is?

image

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Don’t worry about border shading or other such formatting (e.g., column widths). The only formatting that matters is getting the symbols right.

On Oct 6, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Ian McGregor notifications@github.com wrote:

 External Email - Exercise Caution

@teixeirakhttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fteixeirak&data=02%7C01%7Cteixeirak%40si.edu%7Cbf4db8b51ccd4832418908d86a63ee5f%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C637376324723925096&sdata=agvob7B5UX756nVNa7JQM3RVXdY4ykFo%2Bvhntw4hpZY%3D&reserved=0 here is an example of Table 2 redone - since they will be recreating the table from scratch, do I need to put in the same formatting (i.e. border shading) or is this ok as is?

[image]https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fuser-images.githubusercontent.com%2F39522449%2F95278564-79c61d80-081e-11eb-97b2-55f890ab2e7a.png&data=02%7C01%7Cteixeirak%40si.edu%7Cbf4db8b51ccd4832418908d86a63ee5f%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C637376324723935060&sdata=%2FnPbhyFVwbJJhpbhTK7IwQ%2B6IAd3eA1%2BQ7OsUcPdnks%3D&reserved=0

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FSCBI-ForestGEO%2FMcGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation%2Fissues%2F150%23issuecomment-704645888&data=02%7C01%7Cteixeirak%40si.edu%7Cbf4db8b51ccd4832418908d86a63ee5f%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C637376324723935060&sdata=aN8SZlE80Wp4%2Fi8AIjPUhDSX4gNa53b4%2BjVhjor48yc%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FABQPXDRLJRLPEFS6XND2BWLSJPC5NANCNFSM4SEUYKJA&data=02%7C01%7Cteixeirak%40si.edu%7Cbf4db8b51ccd4832418908d86a63ee5f%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C637376324723945018&sdata=kpXC%2BoP1yyB26GdxP0OiUwB400%2F2hQZFAZMnRpcp6L0%3D&reserved=0.

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Ok I've redone the tables and saved the new word doc as McGregor_manuscript_New_Phytologist. I've also made double-checked the SI and saved it as a PDF.

I think that should be about it. I have free tomorrow 8-10 and 12-1.30 so if there's anything else last-minute I should be able to get that done.

teixeirak commented 3 years ago

Thank you; I made a few small tweaks and submitted!

mcgregorian1 commented 3 years ago

Perfect, thank you!

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:42 AM Kristina Anderson-Teixeira < notifications@github.com> wrote:

Thank you; I made a few small tweaks and submitted!

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SCBI-ForestGEO/McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation/issues/150#issuecomment-704878519, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJNRBEKTEXHY57KCQXWAT53SJRHZRANCNFSM4SEUYKJA .

--

Ian McGregor

Ph.D. Student | Center for Geospatial Analytics

He/Him/His

College of Natural Resources

Jordan Hall 4120 | Campus Box 7106

North Carolina State University

2800 Faucette Dr.

Raleigh, NC 27695 USA imcgreg@ncsu.edu | 714-864-1005 | geospatial.ncsu.edu