SCBI-ForestGEO / McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation

repository for linking the climate sensitity of tree growth (derived from cores) to functional traits
0 stars 0 forks source link

public archiving #86

Closed teixeirak closed 3 years ago

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Current text:

"All data, code, and results are available through the SCBI-ForestGEO organization on GitHub (https://github.com/SCBI-ForestGEO: SCBI-ForestGEO-Data and McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation repositories), with static versions corresponding to data and analyses presented here archived in Zenodo (DOIs: 10.5281/zenodo.3604993 and [TBD], respectively "

Thus, upon acceptance, we need to:

(1) make this repo public (2) archive in Zenodo

@mcgregorian1, nothing to do with Zenodo before the first submission.

Do you want to make this whole repo public, or just archive in Zenodo?

mcgregorian1 commented 4 years ago

This all sounds good. I was wondering if we should rename this? Should it include my last name explicitly or refer to the paper itself?

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Up to you. I think including your last name is fine (and helpful), but you might consider changing the "climate-sensitivity-variation" part, as it evolved to focus specifically on drought. That said, it's fine as is.

mcgregorian1 commented 4 years ago

Maybe then "McGregor_climate_drought_sensitivity"

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

just "McGregor_drought_sensitivity"

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Let's also clean up the repo a bit (e.g., delete old stuff). For example, can this folder be deleted?

mcgregorian1 commented 4 years ago

Yep it can since we've moved away from using those. I've saved the poster for myself (that was the poster for the VWL annual meeting in March last year). I will look further at other items in the repo.

mcgregorian1 commented 4 years ago

I'm looking through the repo to clean it up.

I have created a new folder called "non_publication", which contains all the files (data, scripts, e.g.) that I was originally using for the analysis but now am no longer. I am not sure which of these you'd like to keep. They include:

Data

Graphs_plots

Scripts

Manuscript

Other questions

Afterwards

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Thanks! I'll go through all this later.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

I just realized that I owe some responses here. Will go through this now. I'll check items that are okay to remove, and add point-by-point responses as needed.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

@mcgregorian1 , note that references can't be published.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

[ ] PDSI data for winchester, along with a short script for parsing through it.

Wouldn't hurt to add this to the ForestGEO climate data repo (here, with appropriate README.). But okay to just remove if you don't have time for that.

mcgregorian1 commented 4 years ago

@mcgregorian1 , note that references can't be published.

Gotcha. I'll keep an eye out in case there are any rogue PDFs anywhere.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago
* The only NEON data I use I kept in the original data/heights/NEON folder. Otherwise, everything [here](https://github.com/SCBI-ForestGEO/McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation/tree/master/non_publication/data/height/NEON) in the non-publication was not used. Is this ok? Did you want to keep the tower diagram pdf in the original?

I'd like to keep these; moved to data folder.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago
* The [climate](https://github.com/SCBI-ForestGEO/McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation/tree/master/data/climate) folder contains files that are not used in any of my code (the file that _is_ used (the CRU data) is linked to Ryan's repo and opens from there. It is only used for making the time series plots in Figure 1). However, I noticed from your readme that these should not be edited/removed. Can you elaborate please?

You can delete anything that's not used, but keep the CRU data because its needed for the figure.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago
* did you want to keep the PDFs of some of the [references](https://github.com/SCBI-ForestGEO/McGregor_climate-sensitivity-variation/tree/master/references)?

As noted earlier, those cannot be made public. Please remove here/ keep them in your personal archive.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Once final edits are finished, we'll want to remove all of these. Please keep them in a personal archive (and I will too):

image
teixeirak commented 4 years ago
* the last thing that needs to be done after these are addressed is for me to make new README files

@mcgregorian1 , just a reminder on this.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Once final edits are finished, we'll want to remove all of these. Please keep them in a personal archive (and I will too):

I moved all but the for_production folder; that goes later.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

@mcgregorian1 , actually, publishing and releasing this repo needs to come before finalizing the files, as we need to insert the DOI in the data availability statement.

I have everything I need from the non-publication folder, so you can make sure that you do, and then delete. Once that's done, let me know and I'll do the release.

mcgregorian1 commented 4 years ago

I think I'm good to go with this.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Ok, thanks! Working on the cleanup/ release now.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Okay, repo is public!

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Okay, it's released, and on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/record/4070060#.X30QaR17nzI.

This is a pre-release; we'll do final release once all files are finalized.

mcgregorian1 commented 4 years ago

Ok! Thank you

mcgregorian1 commented 4 years ago

[ ] PDSI data for winchester, along with a short script for parsing through it.

Wouldn't hurt to add this to the ForestGEO climate data repo (here, with appropriate README.). But okay to just remove if you don't have time for that.

I'm wasn't able to get to this tonight. The data in there was other exploratory data that I realized the readme didn't cover. I think the main explainers of it are hidden in an early github issue for this repo.

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Don't worry about the PDSI data if it's too complicated.