Open bbartley opened 3 years ago
It appears that some parameters may only be given in particular units and we need to be able to verify this. Is this the idea?
Yep, that's the idea. For example, if there were a Parameter
representing volume, we want to tell the user that the volume must be specified in microliters, as opposed to, say liters. I don't think we need a new opil term for units though. I believe the right predicate to use here is simply om:hasUnit
We could do that, although the Parameter class is not included in the domain specified for hasUnit in the Units of Measure ontology. That can cause problems only if we do OWL reasoning, which we have no plans to do right now.
Related to #135
Hi Jake,
Just so I can keep abreast of what you're up to, what is PAML? A Google search turns up Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood, but I'm guessing you mean something else.
Thanks,
Rich
Richard Markeloff, Ph.D. Senior Scientist Raytheon BBN Technologies Office: 703-284-1221 Mobile: 571-485-0189 Email: richard.markeloff@raytheon.com
From: Jacob Beal notifications@github.com
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 5:49 AM
To: SD2E/opil opil@noreply.github.com
Cc: rmarkelo richard.markeloff@rtx.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com
Subject: [External] Re: [SD2E/opil] Parameters
need a unit
property (#8)
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/SD2E/opil/issues/8*issuecomment-777358067__;Iw!!MvWE!XUllapWH_PvnRWGl_UUVgflxS2u59mhYBsiDQjeKevtD8r2L1Kag7uwRrZPdL9qTeny_$, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQTI4O66VG2ILTLFXZ3ZQFDS6OY3NANCNFSM4RYZKSBA__;!!MvWE!XUllapWH_PvnRWGl_UUVgflxS2u59mhYBsiDQjeKevtD8r2L1Kag7uwRrZPdLxRCR-3f$.
Some Protocol Parameters will need to specify a unit. It is not possible to use sbol.Measure for this, because Measures require both a unit and a value