search

SDG-InterfaceOntology / sdgio

The repository for the Sustainable Development Goals Interface Ontology
64 stars 19 forks source link

Consistent labeling of planned processes #172

Closed Mttbnchtt closed 5 years ago

Mttbnchtt commented 5 years ago

@marieALaporte @pbuttigieg The labels of processes that have already been added to the planned process class usually do not start with the term 'process'. I suppose that previous editors thought that doing so would have been redundant. However, in the M1 draft we did begin every label of processes with the term 'process'. Should we adopt the previous editors' style for consistency and avoidance of redundancy? Or should we preserve our stylistic innovation perhaps for the sake of clarity of labeling?

marieALaporte commented 5 years ago

I would go with the old style as many ontologies are following it, but I am fine if we decide to change that and go for more clarity.

Mttbnchtt commented 5 years ago

@pbuttigieg suggested in a personal communication to use "planned process". I will close this issue for now, but more can be said when we review the PR #170.