Closed Caroline-A closed 9 months ago
I have:
Comments:
12.2 phrase 3: There is a suggestion in https://github.com/SDGforskning/sdg-strings/issues/154 to move some terms from phrase 3 to 1, "Take out generic terms and incorporate into phrase 1 (e.g. (("saving" OR "save$" OR "conserv" OR "efficien") NEAR/5 ("use" OR "using" OR "usage" OR "utili" OR "consumption")) OR (("sustainab" OR "responsib" OR "environmental" OR "ecological" OR "eco" OR "green") NEAR/5 ("consumption" OR "consume$" OR "consumer$" OR "design" OR "technolog*")" - this is not done, was it tested?
The first part is retained in phrase 3 (it was better there after phrase 1 has a looser connection to natural resources, whereas phrase 3 is closer). The second part ("consumption" OR "consume$" OR "consumer$"
) was moved to phrase 1 (design and technology were removed - have added a comment on this now).
12.2 noted change in phrase 4: land OR soil moved to be combined with "resources" OR "minerals". Is done in topic, but not action, is that intended? 12.3: Documentation needs updating to take into account the fact that two phrases have been merged (https://github.com/SDGforskning/sdg-strings/issues/149)
Both oversights, fixed now.
12.5: Topic - noted change in phrase 1: "Relatively large structural change that changes the focus away from waste generally, to reductions in waste and waste generation - see the string itself for changes." First part is same as corresponding action string – perhaps worth mentioning in documentation? And perhaps the wording shoud be harmonized, so that in both approaches it says it is about "reducing waste and waste generation"?
Was poorly worded in the pull request notes, have edited in both places (string doc and PR)
12.6: Comment in (https://github.com/SDGforskning/sdg-strings/issues/151) about using the SCP string (suppose it is meant in phrase 2, as it says "(as used in phrase 1)") - if correctly understood, it has not been implemented - has it been tested?
Not implemented in this round.
12.8: Noted that ; "education for sustainable development is added as a stand-alone term (https://github.com/SDGforskning/sdg-strings/issues/91)" - is that so? It looks to me as if it has been removed - I may misunderstand, but perhaps best to check? I also find the documentation of phrase 1 a little unclear - perhaps consider rewording? Also look at grammar of last sentence of documentation for phrase 2. For phrase 2, noted that "eco-label*" was added, but it is "eco-labels" and "eco-labelling" that is added, is that intended/ok?
It is covered by the phrases in phrase 1 - the sentence has been changed to make clear that ESD is now covered by its own phrase (Phrase 1). Phrase 2 now uses eco-label*
12.a: The interpretation is a bit heavy - I wonder - is it "the promoting capacity of developing countries for sustainable consumption and production" (= as it is now, action approach), or "the capacity of developing countries for promoting sustainable consumption and production" (to me the latter is easier to grasp, but unsure if something goes missing? 12.a: noted "capacity terms now the same in both phrases", but looks like "technological capacity" is in phrase 2, but not 1
This has now been edited/fixed.
Edit SDG12
Target 12.1
standards
to be plural only when alone, and allowed it asstandard$
when combined withnational OR regional...
#158cleaner production
so that it no longer has to be combined withsustainable OR green OR eco...
eco-tourism
,eco-building$
and `bio-econom*´ as synonyms for the one-word variant #148lifestyles$ / life-styles$
to be combined in phrases ("sustainable lifestyle$" OR "sustainable life style$" OR "green lifestyle$" OR "eco lifestyle$" OR "environmental lifestyle$"
) to avoid medical results.Target 12.2
logging
as stand-alone). Moved forest terms (*forest* OR woodland*
) so that they have to be combined with sustainable + management/use terms, rather than alone with sustainable terms. Addedmining
as a natural resource use term. Added"resource us*" OR "usage" OR "practice$"
to the management/use terms. #154 . Moved"consumption" OR "consume$" OR "consumer$"
from phrase 3 to phrase 1&2."consumption" OR "consume$" OR "consumer$"
from phrase 3 to phrase 1&2 ("design*" OR "technolog*"
were removed). Moved ecolabelling terms so that they have to be combined with natural resources. #154 . Addedeco-label$
as a synonym for the one-word variant. #148 .land OR soil
moved to be combined with"resources" OR "minerals"
. A number of "loss" and "rubbish" terms were removed - other targets cover this and it is not part of the interpretation.Target 12.3
legume$
Target 12.4
Clarified the interpretation. Most changes from #150
life NEAR/3 cycle
changed to"lifecycle$" OR "life cycle$"
, mainly added noise from cycle life of batteries. Added"utilisa*" OR "utiliza*"
to the use terms andsafety OR safely
to the sustainable terms. Standardised the management terms between phrase 1 and 2 - phrase 1 is now"lifecycle$" OR "life cycle$" OR "end of life" OR "management" OR "handling" OR "packaging" OR "labelling" OR "storage" OR "storing" OR "stored" OR "disposal" OR "dispose$" OR "transport*" OR "process*" OR "use$" OR "using" OR "utilisa*" OR "utiliza*" OR "production"
. The terms"cradle to cradle" OR "cradle-to-cradle" OR "lifecycle analysis" OR "life cycle analysis" OR "lifecycle assessment$" OR "life cycle assessment$"
have been added/moved so that they are no longer required to be combined with sustainable terms.safety OR safely
to the sustainable terms. Standardised the management terms between phrases 1 and 2 - phrase 2 is now"lifecycle$" OR "life cycle$" OR "end of life" OR "management" OR "handling" OR "packaging" OR "labelling" OR "storage" OR "storing" OR "stored" OR "disposal" OR "dispose$" OR "transport*" OR "process*" OR "incinerat*" OR "combust*" OR "collect*" OR "treatment" OR "sorting" OR "sorted"
. Removed the superfluous full convention names. The terms"cradle to cradle" OR "cradle-to-cradle" OR "lifecycle analysis" OR "life cycle analysis" OR "lifecycle assessment$" OR "life cycle assessment$"
have been added/moved to be with the recycling terms (no longer required to be combined with sustainable terms).NOT
statement to"lead to"
Target 12.5
Relatively large changes to structure - for conversion to python check the whole string, rather than just these notes.
eliminate
as an action term. Topic - Relatively large structural change that changes the focus away from waste generally, to reductions in waste and waste generation - see the string itself for changes.urban OR cities OR manufacturing OR industr*
as waste type terms. Added"agrowaste" OR "solid waste$"
as waste terms.life NEAR/3 cycle
changed to"lifecycle$" OR "life cycle$"
, mainly added noise from cycle life of batteries. Addedzero-waste
as a stand-alone term. Addedrecycl* OR re cycl*
so that they can be combined withsustainable OR environmental....
. Added"lifecycle$" OR "life cycle$" OR "cradle to cradle" OR "cradle-to-cradle" OR "material footprint" OR "resource footprint"
with the recycing terms. Limited some of the more generic terms -"bioeconom*" OR "production" OR "produce$" OR "product$" OR "consumption" OR "consume$" OR "consumer$" OR "packaging" OR "matter" OR "biomass"
by limiting what they are combined with. Forcedcleaner production
andresource efficiency
to be used in combination with waste terms (#157). Altered one of the NEAR/5 to NEAR/15.Target 12.6
eco-building$
as a synonym for the one-word variant #148cleaner production
so that it no longer has to be combined withsustainable OR green OR eco...
corporate OR "industrial sector$" OR "commercial sector$" OR "logistics sector$" OR "manufacturing sector$"
to the companies terms. Dropped superfluous"energy efficien*"
term. #151 and #90corporate OR "industrial sector$" OR "commercial sector$" OR "logistics sector$" OR "manufacturing sector$"
to the companies terms."environmental information disclosure"
as a phrase, and"disclos*"
as a synonym to "publish"Target 12.7
circular
as a sustainability term. Changedresponsib*
to"socially responsible" OR "social responsibilit*"
- #87"green public procurement$" OR "circular public procurement$"
as standalone termstender
totender$
Target 12.8
Major changes here - in the structure, interpretation and terminology. More terms have been added for SCP (from 12.1); the interpretation has been tightened and thus terms for psychology and behaviour are removed; various phrases for education for sustainable development are added as a stand-alone phrase (phrase 1) (#91). These changes have removed some of the noisy results about health (#88).
eco-building$
andeco-label*
as a synonym for the one-word variant - note that here there was also an error that was fixed (ecobuildin$
) #148 .lifestyles
has been added as suggested in #164.Target 12.a
Edited interpretation to focus on capacity, rather than scientific and technological capabilities. Also did some major changes to the capacity terms - now these are the same between both phrases.
cleaner production
so that it no longer has to be combined withsustainable OR green OR eco...
. Addedeco-tourism
,eco-building$
andbio-econom*
as synonyms for the one-word variant #148 . Narrowedlifestyles$ / life-styles$
to be combined in phrases ("sustainable lifestyle$" OR "sustainable life style$" OR "green lifestyle$" OR "eco lifestyle$" OR "environmental lifestyle$"
) to avoid medical results.energy transitions
andhydropower
(#156 and #92 ). Added action terms to the action approach (same as phrase 1).Target 12.b
survey*
as a monitoring term.Target 12.c
Interpretation altered in topic - removed rationalising/reforming so that the string covers subsities/tax + fossil fuels. Action retains rationalising/reforming, now more tightly linked to the tax/subsidy terms.
conventional energy
as a term for fossil fuels.subsidy
in the subsidy termsNOT TS=("heavy duty" OR "light duty" OR "medium duty")