SDGforskning / sdg-strings

Search strings for finding SDG-related works per goal and target (python script, WoS search strategy)
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
3 stars 4 forks source link

Edit SDG12 (WoS) #126

Closed Caroline-A closed 9 months ago

Caroline-A commented 1 year ago

Edit SDG12

Target 12.1

Target 12.2

Target 12.3

Target 12.4

Clarified the interpretation. Most changes from #150

Target 12.5

Relatively large changes to structure - for conversion to python check the whole string, rather than just these notes.

Target 12.6

Target 12.7

Target 12.8

Major changes here - in the structure, interpretation and terminology. More terms have been added for SCP (from 12.1); the interpretation has been tightened and thus terms for psychology and behaviour are removed; various phrases for education for sustainable development are added as a stand-alone phrase (phrase 1) (#91). These changes have removed some of the noisy results about health (#88).

Target 12.a

Edited interpretation to focus on capacity, rather than scientific and technological capabilities. Also did some major changes to the capacity terms - now these are the same between both phrases.

Target 12.b

Target 12.c

Interpretation altered in topic - removed rationalising/reforming so that the string covers subsities/tax + fossil fuels. Action retains rationalising/reforming, now more tightly linked to the tax/subsidy terms.

EliSeland commented 11 months ago

I have:

Comments:

Caroline-A commented 11 months ago

12.2 phrase 3: There is a suggestion in https://github.com/SDGforskning/sdg-strings/issues/154 to move some terms from phrase 3 to 1, "Take out generic terms and incorporate into phrase 1 (e.g. (("saving" OR "save$" OR "conserv" OR "efficien") NEAR/5 ("use" OR "using" OR "usage" OR "utili" OR "consumption")) OR (("sustainab" OR "responsib" OR "environmental" OR "ecological" OR "eco" OR "green") NEAR/5 ("consumption" OR "consume$" OR "consumer$" OR "design" OR "technolog*")" - this is not done, was it tested?

The first part is retained in phrase 3 (it was better there after phrase 1 has a looser connection to natural resources, whereas phrase 3 is closer). The second part ("consumption" OR "consume$" OR "consumer$") was moved to phrase 1 (design and technology were removed - have added a comment on this now).

12.2 noted change in phrase 4: land OR soil moved to be combined with "resources" OR "minerals". Is done in topic, but not action, is that intended? 12.3: Documentation needs updating to take into account the fact that two phrases have been merged (https://github.com/SDGforskning/sdg-strings/issues/149)

Both oversights, fixed now.

12.5: Topic - noted change in phrase 1: "Relatively large structural change that changes the focus away from waste generally, to reductions in waste and waste generation - see the string itself for changes." First part is same as corresponding action string – perhaps worth mentioning in documentation? And perhaps the wording shoud be harmonized, so that in both approaches it says it is about "reducing waste and waste generation"?

Was poorly worded in the pull request notes, have edited in both places (string doc and PR)

12.6: Comment in (https://github.com/SDGforskning/sdg-strings/issues/151) about using the SCP string (suppose it is meant in phrase 2, as it says "(as used in phrase 1)") - if correctly understood, it has not been implemented - has it been tested?

Not implemented in this round.

12.8: Noted that ; "education for sustainable development is added as a stand-alone term (https://github.com/SDGforskning/sdg-strings/issues/91)" - is that so? It looks to me as if it has been removed - I may misunderstand, but perhaps best to check? I also find the documentation of phrase 1 a little unclear - perhaps consider rewording? Also look at grammar of last sentence of documentation for phrase 2. For phrase 2, noted that "eco-label*" was added, but it is "eco-labels" and "eco-labelling" that is added, is that intended/ok?

It is covered by the phrases in phrase 1 - the sentence has been changed to make clear that ESD is now covered by its own phrase (Phrase 1). Phrase 2 now uses eco-label*

12.a: The interpretation is a bit heavy - I wonder - is it "the promoting capacity of developing countries for sustainable consumption and production" (= as it is now, action approach), or "the capacity of developing countries for promoting sustainable consumption and production" (to me the latter is easier to grasp, but unsure if something goes missing? 12.a: noted "capacity terms now the same in both phrases", but looks like "technological capacity" is in phrase 2, but not 1

This has now been edited/fixed.