Closed laurenliz22 closed 1 year ago
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
I think this is a request from Better Buildings and ACE. Revisit when those projects start.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
I took the BETTER label off because it relates to the Better Buildings use case not the BETTER analysis.
correct, thanks @RDmitchell
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Instance: seeddemostaging SHA: https://github.com/SEED-platform/seed/commit/22e66f350d3a054428ecedcbd37a664d915bac39 Org: LBNL 303
I tested this with the Sample_MultipleCycles.xlsx file and it worked great !
@anchapin / @laurenliz22
I tested with a pretty simple file.
It might be good to get a real file from Better Buildings or some other source (CERL) with a lot of records and a lot of different Year Ending values to do more robust testing.
How they can best import their data from ESPM. They also mentioned importing multiple years in the same file, which sounded like a similar request that we received from Better Buildings.