Closed tianxie1995 closed 2 years ago
b_city_id and b_zone_id were updated to city_id and zone_id in refiner_events table. New hdf is on test_inputs folder. You can drop remaining b_zone_id and b_city_id now.
b_city_id and b_zone_id were updated to city_id and zone_id in refiner_events table. New hdf is on test_inputs folder. You can drop remaining b_zone_id and b_city_id now.
There are some b_city_id
in agent_expression
. I have replaced them with city_id
in /RDF2050/model_inputs/test_inputs/all_semcog_data_02-02-18-final-forecast_newbid.h5
.
I updated those on my local but Looks like the copied one was still not correct.
In addition, another place we need to look into is the "outputindicators.py". It uses "b" geographies quite extensively.
I updated those on my local but Looks like the copied one was still not correct.
Should be there now, I think the copying takes a bit of time.
In addition, another place we need to look into is the "outputindicators.py". It uses "b" geographies quite extensively.
Yes, I saw those. I can start cleaning this up after getting the test output.
"b_zone_id" and "b_city_id" were created to deal with super parcels in the 2045 forecast.
In the 2050 forecast, data has well-nested geographies without this issue