There are multiple instances in ADMS-APv2.0.1 where the cardinality of a property is defined as 1..n, but in reality, the intention is that of 1..1, with the note that the property can be translated.
I would suggest that we assume a different notation for expressing this cardinality.
This should be expressed in the shacl representation.
( sh:uniqueLang true )
There are multiple instances in ADMS-APv2.0.1 where the cardinality of a property is defined as 1..n, but in reality, the intention is that of 1..1, with the note that the property can be translated.
I would suggest that we assume a different notation for expressing this cardinality.
This should be expressed in the shacl representation. ( sh:uniqueLang true )
Some examples: Asset:
Asset repository:
Asset distribution: