For the property "related service" in the class Public Service in CPSV-AP v.3.1, why not use dct:relation (as in CPSV-AP v.3.0) instead of creating a new/own URI cv:relatedService?
[Similarly, for the property "requires" in the same class, you use the existing dct:requires instead of creating a new/own URI cv:requiresService]
For the property "related service" in the class Public Service in CPSV-AP v.3.1, why not use
dct:relation
(as in CPSV-AP v.3.0) instead of creating a new/own URIcv:relatedService
?[Similarly, for the property "requires" in the same class, you use the existing dct:requires instead of creating a new/own URI cv:requiresService]