In Flanders an indication is given for each type of entity which standards the entity conforms to. Example: an entity is of type registry service when it offers data according to the ISO19115 standard.
The properties of a standard are the following:
property
definition
title
Name of the standard
langString [0..1]
description
Brief description of the standard
langString [0..1]
identifier
Unique identifier
string [1..1]
type
Categorisation of the standard
Concept [0..n]
seeAlso
Link to the specification
Resource [0..1]
versionInfo
Version of the standard
string [0..1]
issued
Date of publication of the standard
dateTime [0..1]
prefLabel
Abbreviated notation of the standard, e.g., ISO19115
string [0..1]
Adding the identifier allows us to refer to the exact specification by the standard, if possible, to the entity. For example:
The attributes seeAlso and prefLabel are additions on top of GeoDCAT-AP. Could this be interesting on the DCAT-AP level as well, as we feel that this would be a more generic improvement?
In Flanders an indication is given for each type of entity which standards the entity conforms to. Example: an entity is of type registry service when it offers data according to the ISO19115 standard.
The properties of a standard are the following:
ISO19115
Adding the identifier allows us to refer to the exact specification by the standard, if possible, to the entity. For example:
The attributes
seeAlso
andprefLabel
are additions on top of GeoDCAT-AP. Could this be interesting on the DCAT-AP level as well, as we feel that this would be a more generic improvement?Related ticket: https://github.com/SEMICeu/GeoDCAT-AP/issues/115