Closed AntoRot closed 3 years ago
Thanks for raising this issue, @AntoRot .
An option would be to drop support for the use of free-text for the specification of access limitations, and require the use of URIs only. However, this may have an impact in metadata records not yet aligned with the requirements of the INSPIRE MD TG or other ISO 19115 records, as it will result in information loss.
I would propose we keep the examples as they are, but highlight the recommendation of the INSPIRE MD TG on the specification of access limitations, stating also that the use of free-text is allowed only for legacy metadata records not yet compliant with the latest version of the INSPIRE MD TG.
The proposed revision is implemented in the following pull request: https://github.com/SEMICeu/GeoDCAT-AP/pull/28
Do you think this solution is acceptable?
Thanks @andrea-perego.
Your proposal sounds fine to me.
Revision implemented in the editor's draft in view of the publication of the 2nd working draft:
INSPIRE TG Requirement C.17 states that limitations on public access (or lack of such limitations) shall be described using a combination of one instance of gmd:accessConstraints/gmd:MD_RestrictionCode element with code list value "otherRestrictions" and at least one instance of gmd:otherConstraints/gmx:Anchor pointing to one of the values from the code list for LimitationsOnPublicAccess. The first part of the example (i.e. Resource metadata in ISO 19139) provided in the section B.6.15 Conditions for access and use and limitations on public access – Use limitation and access / other constraints is not consistent with the requirement mentioned above, as free text is not allowed for describing the limitations on public access. Consequently, the example should be revised as follows:
Resource metadata in ISO 19139:
and consequently
Resource metadata in GeoDCAT-AP: