Closed andrea-perego closed 3 years ago
The GeoDCAT-AP approach, along with [DQV] and [EARL], is documented in DCAT 2 as one of the possible ways of specifying conformance (see §12.2.2 Degree of conformance and, in particular, Example 35).
Based on this, no revision is needed as far as compatibility with DCAT 2 is concerned.
Closing following the publication of the first working draft for GeoDCAT-AP 2.0.0:
https://semiceu.github.io/GeoDCAT-AP/drafts/2.0.0-draft-0.1/
As explained in the email report of 23 May 2016, the Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV) models conformance by using
dct:conformsTo
(as done in Geo/DCAT-AP). The relevant section uses GeoDCAT-AP as an example:https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/#ExpressConformanceWithStandard
This approach was also reported in the Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices published by the joint W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web WG, by using a GeoDCAT-AP-related example (see section on spatial metadata.
However, DQV does not provide a solution to model test results different from "conformant" (e.g., "not conformant", "not evaluated"). The rationale is explained in a note to the same section:
Therefore, there is not, at the moment, an alternative solution to the one defined in GeoDCAT-AP.