Some feeds double type some catalogs as data services. I think that makes sense, but I wonder:
Can the service and the catalog, while sharing the same identifier, only appear in an update as a double types entity, or can they also each have their own lifecycle? I think the latter might be a recipe for disaster and we should only allow double typed entities to appear in an atomic update.
Some feeds double type some catalogs as data services. I think that makes sense, but I wonder:
Can the service and the catalog, while sharing the same identifier, only appear in an update as a double types entity, or can they also each have their own lifecycle? I think the latter might be a recipe for disaster and we should only allow double typed entities to appear in an atomic update.
@matthiaspalmer do you have any ideas about this?
Originally raised by @smessie