Closed julianrojas87 closed 2 years ago
Yes, certainly. We’ll introduce a tree:View as an extra class that gives a URI to the specific view on top of this LDES.
For backwards compatibility we’ll need to make sure that the basic use of this is double typing it with a tree:Node, and maybe even a tree:EntryNode or tree:RootNode
Was fixed now through tree:ViewDescription
The
ldes:retentionPolicy
property is defined as:But there is no class
tree:View
defined in the TREE vocabulary. Given that this is a LDES specific property, shouldn't its domain beldes:EventStream
instead?