SEMICeu / SDG-sandbox

The SDG Sandbox creates a space for the review of data models produced by WP4 - Data semantics, formats and quality - in the context of the preparatory work for the Single Digital Gateway Regulation.
14 stars 9 forks source link

[EXAMPLE] XSD's for Vehicle Owner/Holder data exchanged already in the EU based on COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2018/1541 #15

Closed roefie64 closed 3 years ago

roefie64 commented 4 years ago

Here are the specifications and XSD's for exchanging vehicle owner/holder data used for investigating VAT fraud. It can be used to verify the vehicle registration evidence design against a pratical implementation. It does contains addresses in 2 ways: 1 as all separate fields like street, streetnumber, postcode, city and one as "Printable Address" lines. The first is used to store as structered data the second can be used for writing a letter or envelope in the right order. The same goes for the person/company name fields.

XSD-VAT.zip EUCARIS XML Message Specification VAT.pdf

cbahim commented 4 years ago

@roefie64 thanks a lot for this! We will analyse them and report back either here or during the next webinar of WP4, on the 29th of July.

cbahim commented 3 years ago

After an analysis of the VAT XSD’s, we can conclude that there seem to be no major semantic differences between both models. Nevertheless, some additional classes/attributes can be found within the VAT XSD’s, for which we need input from the member states on whether or not they are required.

Classes/attributes with regards to mileage and odometer history.

Classes/attributes with regards to vehicle signal, i.e. the status of a vehicle or vehicle registration related circumstance or qualification, that normally emerged after registration of the vehicle. A signal/status may be temporary or definite. E.g. vehicle stolen, de-registered, exported, plates stolen, duplicate certificate, etc. For further discussion on this, see issue #16 Additional attributes for Vehicle:

Additional dates:

Definitions:

Relevant definitions that can be reused:

The last sentence raises the question whether the cardinality of vehicle owner should be changed to [0..1].

Finally, it would be useful if the usage notes refer to the Community Codes as in the Council Directive 1999/37/EC of 29 April 1999 on the registration documents for vehicles, e.g. (D.1) = Vehicle.make.

cbahim commented 3 years ago

Since no member states further commented on adding the above mentioned attributes, we will therefore leave them out of the model.